Type four words and get a full style prompt back — instruments, arrangement, production character and a tempo. Instant, and four credits a run.
What it does
Music models respond to some words far more than others. Naming instruments, giving a tempo as a number and describing production character all change the output substantially. Piling up adjectives mostly does not. The gap between a prompt that works and one that does not is usually knowledge of that vocabulary rather than effort.
This closes that gap. Type the rough idea — "dark synthwave with a live drummer" — and what comes back names the oscillators, describes the drum treatment, mentions the tape saturation and gives a BPM. It reads like something written by someone who knows what the model reacts to, because it is generated by the same family of models.
The result belongs in the style field rather than in the song description. Those are two different inputs doing two different jobs: one says what the track sounds like, the other says what it is about. Mixing them is the single most common reason a generation ignores half of what you asked for.

How it works
A few words in, a paragraph out, immediately.
A genre and one distinguishing feature is plenty. "Bossa nova but melancholy" or "trap with orchestral strings" both work.
The interesting part is what you did not say — the instruments it named, the tempo it chose, the production terms it used. That is the vocabulary worth learning.
Not the description field. Keep the description for what the song is about.
What you get
Not longer for the sake of it — longer in the specific dimensions the model responds to. Length alone changes nothing; naming an instrument does.
dark synthwave with a live drummer
instrumentation, arrangement, mix character and a tempo — the things the model acts on
Instruments, arrangement, production character and tempo. Get those into a prompt and the rest is decoration.
The style field and the description field are read differently. An expanded sound description in the wrong one is largely wasted.
Naming an artist does not get you their sound. Listing ten instruments gets you a muddy arrangement. A paragraph of adjectives does almost nothing at all.
Who uses it
The most common case. You can hear it; you just cannot name the drum treatment.
Usually a prompt with no instruments and no tempo in it. Expanding it fixes both.
Expand five prompts and read what they have in common. That is the whole lesson.
Ask for one you have never made and see what it says the ingredients are.
Expand the same idea twice and you get two different specific readings of it.
A specific description of a sound is useful to a human musician too.
FAQ

Four words in, a usable style prompt out. Four credits a run.